Earth logo

Why china is losing this microchip war?

Exploring Factors Behind China's Microchip Manufacturing Setback, a must-read insight

By Shubham BajajPublished 9 months ago 4 min read
1

In 2012, Zongchang Yu took a bold step by leaving his engineering role at ASML, a company known as the sole creator of an extraordinary machine. This machine held the power to produce the most advanced microchips, also known as semiconductor chips, in the world. Following his departure from ASML, Yu embarked on an ambitious journey, establishing two new companies—one based in the United States and the other in China.

However, the story takes an intriguing turn as legal battles unfolded between the United States, ASML, and Yu. Allegations surfaced, claiming that Yu had managed to recruit former ASML engineers to join his U.S. venture. These engineers were said to have brought along stolen proprietary information about ASML's revolutionary machine, and shockingly, these actions were allegedly backed by the Chinese government itself. This incident stands as a mere fragment of a much larger narrative—an endeavor by China to overhaul the global semiconductor industry, a sector of immense significance and international reach.

What makes this tale even more captivating is that China's efforts, although initially aimed at transforming the semiconductor industry, have gradually led to a formidable clash with its long-standing rival, the United States. This is no ordinary rivalry; it delves into matters of security, not just market share or trade tariffs. So, how did China and the United States find themselves engaged in a veritable Cold War, the battleground being the realm of computer chips?

To understand the gravity of this conflict, we must first rewind to the origins of semiconductor technology. In the 1950s, visionary engineers in the United States pioneered the very first semiconductor chip—a small slice of silicon adorned with a mere four transistors. Yet, with each passing year, the capability of these chips grew exponentially, thanks to an astonishing phenomenon known as Moore's Law. In 1965, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, predicted that computing power would double approximately every year, a prediction that held remarkably true over the decades.

In those early days, chip manufacturers were primarily dedicated to serving a singular client: the U.S. government. These chips found utility in guiding NASA spacecraft and missile systems during significant historical events. Recognizing the strategic importance of computing prowess, the U.S. government fostered a close alliance with these chip companies, foreseeing that their partnership would ensure access to cutting-edge technology.

Initially, the entire chip supply chain, from design to assembly, was localized within the United States. However, as the years advanced, chip companies realized the potential for greater profits by designing chips for civilian applications. As a result, many manufacturers relocated their production to countries like Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong, where labor was more cost-effective. This move was not only encouraged but also aimed to strengthen economic ties between the U.S. and its allied nations.

Nonetheless, the growing importance of these chips triggered a paradox. While countries like Japan and South Korea mastered chip manufacturing, China found itself lagging behind due to historical circumstances. Mao Zedong's policies had driven away China's finest scientific minds during the 1960s and 70s, leaving the nation with a technological deficit.

However, the tides began to shift in the 1990s, as China endeavored to bridge the gap. With the Cold War drawing to a close, the U.S. adopted a more cooperative stance toward China, lifting export controls and paving the way for chip companies to set up assembly operations within the nation. By the 2000s, China had emerged as a dominant force in chip assembly, feeding its burgeoning tech ecosystem.

Yet, this progress came with a dilemma: China was heavily reliant on imported chips, creating a vulnerability in its technological foundation. In response, the Chinese government initiated a substantial investment in domestic chip design and manufacturing firms, aiming to establish an autonomous chip supply chain. China's aspiration was to not only design and manufacture chips within its borders but also to assemble them, thereby gaining self-reliance.

Despite China's remarkable strides, producing the most advanced chips remained an elusive goal. A major hurdle was the dependency on key players within the global supply chain. For instance, only a handful of American companies held the software essential for designing advanced chips, while ASML stood as the sole producer of a crucial chip-making machine. Additionally, the intricate process of transforming designs into real chips required equipment available exclusively in the U.S. The final step, manufacturing the cutting-edge processor chips, rested solely in the hands of companies from Taiwan and South Korea.

Amidst this backdrop, a dramatic turn of events unfolded in 2019. Zongchang Yu, now CEO of his own company, was accused of IP theft, a tale that resonated with similar stories in the chip industry. These incidents underscored China's pursuit to gain a competitive edge by mimicking established technologies, a strategy that backfired and sparked international concern.

As the chip rivalry intensified, the U.S. implemented a series of strategic moves to maintain its lead. Export controls were imposed, preventing American companies from selling advanced chips to China. Furthermore, the U.S. invested significant funds in its domestic chip manufacturing sector, solidifying its technological prowess. A groundbreaking deal was struck with Taiwan's TSMC to establish chip manufacturing plants on American soil, reinforcing the U.S. commitment to innovation.

Interestingly, China's quest for semiconductor supremacy intertwined with another geopolitical flashpoint: Taiwan. The island nation emerged as a linchpin in the chip supply chain, manufacturing a staggering 63% of all chips and a staggering 92% of advanced chips. However, the U.S. export controls forced Taiwan's chip manufacturers to make a challenging choice: continue trading with China or abide by U.S. restrictions. These decisions hold profound implications, echoing the broader choices nations and corporations may face in an evolving global landscape.

The tale of China's semiconductor surge and the ensuing rivalry with the United States encapsulates a complex narrative of innovation, geopolitics, and security. As nations grapple for dominance in this pivotal industry, the lines between economics and national defense blur, culminating in a new type of Cold War—one fought with silicon wafers and microchips instead of traditional arms. The story remains dynamic, a reflection of the ever-changing landscape of international technology and power struggles.

Like what you read? Consider liking and subscribing for more! :)

SustainabilityScience
1

About the Creator

Shubham Bajaj

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.