Do the laws of physics exist naturally or are they deliberately orchestrated? Are our perceptions correct?

What is "truth"? How do you define "truth"? If you think that truth is something you can see, touch, smell, or taste, then "truth" is nothing more than an electronic signal that your brain responds to. -From the matrix

Whenever the sky is filled with stars at night, looking up at the sea of stars overhead, Mizuki can't help but ponder the question: How does an infinitely small singularity expand space and evolve into the universe through the power of an explosion?

When you think about it, it will give Mizuki (referred to as "Mizuki Longlong") a sense of incomprehensibility, although this theory of the birth of the universe has long been recognized by the scientific community as the most likely.

If the power of the "singularity explosion" to explain the expansion of space, and the theoretical basis can still be found in Einstein's mass equation (the mass of dense matter will be correspondingly large, the explosion of energy power will naturally be incredibly large, think of the power of the atomic bomb will know), then how to cleverly explain the universe of all things the birth and evolution of it? The formation of different kinds of celestial bodies, the emergence of a .different life in the universe, all celestial bodies following the incredible laws of motion, all life following the laws of evolution, the orderly birth and death of all things, all this can be explained by coincidence? Exploring science, and exploring the universe, Mizuki Chiron continues our journey of discovery with you.

If the birth of the universe and the formation of all things is just a coincidence, doesn't it just mean that none of this is a coincidence? Where did the universe come from? Why was the universe born? How exactly did everything in the universe order itself and stay for tens of billions of years?

At one time, biologists believed that the basic conditions for life were inseparable from boiling water, oxygen, the right temperature, light, and an atmosphere that could protect life; they even believed that life was carbon-based life - organisms that use carbon as their organic material. Now we know that life does not necessarily depend on these conditions to survive and thrive, but these conditions are only for most life on Earth.

If for such a vast universe, Earth is not the only place where life exists, what reason do we have to use the physical laws found on Earth as a basis for measuring the physical laws followed by other planets in the universe?

Perhaps, for all living things in the universe, it is not oxygen they breathe, but carbon dioxide. The right temperature is not a few tens of degrees, but a high temperature above 100 degrees or a super low temperature close to absolute zero. Without liquid water, life cannot survive, but others matter. The structure of life is not dominated by carbon, but by other elements as the material basis of living things (for example, silicon-based life), and so on.

What seems to be a universal law that binds everything is hardly a net for all things large and small; what seems to be a regular necessity cannot prevent random mutations. It reminds one of what Neo was told when he met the designer in The Matrix: Your life is the residual sum of an unbalanced factor in the inherent program of The Matrix. You are an accidental deviation, one that despite my best efforts could not be eliminated, affecting the harmony of mathematical precision.

In the process of seemingly inevitable development, the unexpected chance is birthed, and in the evolution of chance, it gradually becomes inevitable, but both are only relative from the beginning to the end, with no absolute boundaries. Neither chance nor necessity will remain unchanged, and this is the root of the problem. In other words, quantum mechanics reveals that "everything is possible". If the existence of everything, including human beings, history, civilization, the universe, etc. If the existence of everything, including human beings, history, civilization, the universe, etc., is nothing but a temporary necessity evolved by chance, just like the temporary creation of imaginary particle pairs in the process of quantum rise and fall, then how can there be unchanging rules and laws for everything?

But why is it that everything around us has rules to follow, cycles and laws that exist, physical laws that exist, whether at rest or in motion?

A disturbing possibility that gradually fades from the veil of concealment with the development of exploration and reasoning is that the existence of everything in the universe as we see it with the naked eye is probably not natural, that is, it is not an accidental product of evolution, but a customary necessity that has been deliberately stripped of its natural evolutionary position and thus placed on a set course of evolutionary rules. Therefore, the evolutionary development of all things, from the initial natural accident, becomes a necessity that follows cause and effect; and it is for this reason that physical philosophers propose the truth that nothing is accidental.

Nothing is accidental. Did all our knowledge, including astronomy, physics, mathematics, chemistry, and philosophy, never really exist? Is the "straight son" in "Three Bodies" a lock on human civilization?

To verify this incredible reasoning, quantum physicists began to explore the truth of it from a microscopic perspective. So, Heisenberg discovered the uncertainty of the microscopic world, Schrödinger proved the instability of the microscopic world with thought experiments, and then various practical quantum experiments were repeatedly verified one after another - is the world accidental or inevitable?

Experiments, thought reasoning, and formula calculations all point to a shocking possibility - there is no necessity in the microscopic world, but rather an unstable existence where the wave function may collapse at any time.

All experiments, whether they are actual quantum experiments, thought experiments, or derivations of mathematical formulas, seem to contain a "variable parameter" that becomes the decisive factor in the instability of the microscopic world.

This variable parameter, which is the decisive factor, is "consciousness". It is the existence of consciousness that makes the microcosm uncertain and unstable because it can never be fixed at a certain point in space-time. Consciousness is eternal and dynamic when it exists. According to quantum theory, the quiescence of consciousness implies the end of all things.

The macroscopic world is the aggregation and expansion of the microscopic world. Why do microscopic uncertainties have stable boundaries in the macroscopic world? When you think about it, it seems a bit incredible. It seems natural to take for granted that we see everything in the universe moving and evolving regularly, and this is what habitual thinking leads to. Because a truly natural universe should be unstable and not bound by rules the biggest impossibility is the regularity of everything we see now.

If the universe is not bound by a will, what should it be like?

The answer is "a state of chaos". The chaotic state of the universe is the real state of the universe.

The chaotic state of the universe contains all the uncertainties, and therefore all the possibilities and all the possible freedoms. Because of this, it is difficult to obtain a stable declaration of will for everything. Perhaps this is the price of freedom.

Thus, the chaotic consciousness began to gather and evolve toward unity, and the chaotic universe began to evolve toward order. Everything in the universe began to emerge slowly, and the will of everything in the universe was finally declared. This is the freedom of unrestrained freedom within the constraints of rules.

If the macrocosm is the result of collective consciousness, then the laws of the universe's operation and the physical laws followed by everything in the universe cannot remain unchanged. Because consciousness is dynamic, the will can't remain unchanged forever. What's more, collective consciousness fluctuates all the time, and it is difficult to maintain the stability of the physical rules. Once everything in the macrocosm is unstable, it will show the uncertainty of the microcosm, but the actual macrocosm is so stable that all the physical and natural laws seem to be eternal. Why?

One possibility is the deliberate setting of our previous speculation that all physical laws, chemical reaction laws, mathematical theorems, etc. are pre-determined. You may ask, who arranged all this? We might make it possible spspeculatehat it is an extraterrestrial civilization that is more advanced than the technological civilization on Earth.

Perhaps the universe is the work of an advanced civilization and the solar system is just one of the experimental sites being enthusiastically followed. They may have set different physical rules and drawn up different evolutionary sequences in different experimental universes. All the knowledge known to mankind, all the physical laws and mathematical theorems discovered, probably do not exist naturally, ut are random parameters at the beginning of an experimental process.