Art logo

When Japan Banned Kabuki Portraits, This Artist Drew Cats Instead. Everyone Knew What He Meant.

Utagawa Kuniyoshi never stopped saying what he wanted to say. He just got better at hiding it.

By 中橋亮太Published 2 months ago 2 min read

Somewhere between researching Sharaku's disappearance and Hokusai's

refusal to call himself finished, I found a third artist who didn't

fit either pattern. This one didn't vanish, and he didn't spend his

life chasing perfection. He spent it getting away with things.

His name was Utagawa Kuniyoshi, and in 1842, the Japanese government

made his job illegal.

THE LAW THAT BANNED HIS ENTIRE CAREER

The Tenpō Reforms of the 1840s were, among other things, an attack

on fun. The shogunate, worried about moral decline and extravagance,

banned depictions of kabuki actors and courtesans — which was, for

an ukiyo-e artist, roughly equivalent to banning the entire subject

of your art form overnight.

Most artists adjusted. Some quietly stopped working. Kuniyoshi did

neither.

He started drawing cats.

Specifically, he started drawing cats dressed as kabuki actors — the

exact same poses, the exact same dramatic expressions, the exact

same instantly recognizable performers, just with whiskers and

pointed ears added. Everyone in Edo knew exactly who was being

depicted. The censors technically couldn't touch it. It wasn't a

portrait of an actor. It was a cat.

He did this constantly. Cats standing in for actors. Warriors and

folk heroes standing in for the government officials he wasn't

allowed to criticize directly. One of his most famous prints stacks

dozens of cats into the shape of the kanji for "catfish" — a pun

so layered that art historians are still unpacking what it was

actually mocking.

THE PART THAT WASN'T A JOKE

It would be easy to file this under "clever loophole" and move on.

But Kuniyoshi's work has a second layer that's easy to miss if

you're only looking for the punchline.

His warrior prints — the ones that weren't hiding behind cat ears —

are some of the most physically intense images in all of ukiyo-e.

Muscles rendered like they're about to tear through the paper.

Expressions caught mid-battle-cry. These weren't polite portraits.

They were meant to hit you in the chest.

That same intensity is what "The Roar" — JAPAN BACKS No.004 — pulls

directly from. The kumadori face paint, the color loud enough to

be seen from the back row of a packed theater, the sense that the

image is about to move. Kuniyoshi didn't invent kabuki face paint,

but he understood, better than almost anyone in his era, how to make

a static print feel like it was still mid-performance.

He wasn't just getting around censorship. He was refusing to make

anything quiet.

WHAT I KEEP NOTICING

Three artists into this research, and I'm starting to see the same

shape over and over. Sharaku, who vanished rather than compromise.

Hokusai, who refused to consider himself finished. Kuniyoshi, who

disguised what he wanted to say as something the law couldn't touch,

and kept saying it anyway.

None of them made things easy for anyone trying to categorize them.

I don't think that's a coincidence, and I don't think it's a

coincidence that K's rule — no two pieces printed the same way

twice — sits comfortably next to all three of them.

Maybe the throughline was never really about ukiyo-e as a style.

Maybe it was always about refusing to sit still.

— More on the history behind JAPAN BACKS: https://japanbacks.etsy.com

Contemporary Art

About the Creator

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by 中橋亮太