The Swamp logo

Napoleon Review: Unveiling the Layers of 'Napoleon' in Theaters

Napoleon: Ridley Scott's Ambitious Foray into History's Enigmatic Emperor

By Suresh ChandPublished 3 months ago 4 min read

In 2005, Ridley Scott's 'Kingdom of Heaven' initially hit theaters, clocking in at 144 minutes, receiving a mixed bag of reviews. However, the subsequent release of the vastly superior 190-minute director's cut altered perceptions entirely. Widely regarded as a storytelling, directing, acting, and cinematographic masterpiece, it became the pinnacle of cinematic portrayals of the crusades.

Fast forward nearly two decades, and we find ourselves grappling with another Ridley Scott film, 'Napoleon,' albeit in a truncated form for its theatrical release. This abridged version, confirmed to be followed by a complete, nearly four-hour epic on streaming platforms, leaves viewers grappling with a sense of haste, missing emotional and historical depth. The consensus is that this swift-paced rendition feels somewhat rushed, failing to delve into crucial facets that would enhance the emotional and historical resonance.

While the 1970 film 'Waterloo,' starring Rod Steiger as Napoleon, focused solely on the 100 days campaign in 1815, Scott's 'Napoleon' spans decades, chronicling pivotal events and battles from the siege of Toulon in 1793 onward. Yet, despite this vast canvas, the film falters in rendering Napoleon's ascendancy to power and fails to elucidate why he garnered widespread admiration. There's a sense that greatness almost stumbles upon him, downplaying his astute political acumen for a portrayal leaning towards a childish, brutish persona. The emphasis seems to sway more toward visually striking set pieces and his tumultuous relationship with Josephine, eclipsing his portrayal as a shrewd and ruthless emperor. Moreover, in the theatrical cut, Joaquin Phoenix's performance lacks the standout moments that would position him as a formidable Oscar contender, raising hopes that the director's cut might rectify this.

Notwithstanding these shortcomings, 'Napoleon' remains a standout film of the year. However, the decision to release only a truncated version in cinemas, especially when audiences have exhibited patience for longer blockbusters like 'Avengers: Endgame,' 'Avatar 2,' and 'Oppenheimer,' raises eyebrows. It prompts speculation whether this strategy is an Apple-driven maneuver aimed at incentivizing subscriptions to their streaming service by withholding the complete experience.

Despite these concerns, the film is anticipated to secure several Oscar nominations, underscoring Ridley Scott's prowess as one of the foremost filmmakers in the industry. Nevertheless, a word of caution echoes: for those planning a single viewing, awaiting the director's cut might ensure a more comprehensive and fulfilling cinematic experience.The anticipation surrounding 'Napoleon' in its theatrical iteration suggests a layered narrative that traverses significant historical epochs. The movie's truncated version, while offering a glimpse into the grandeur of Scott's vision, appears to be a mere prelude to the comprehensive saga awaiting audiences on streaming platforms. And yet, the decision to withhold the complete opus from theaters leaves moviegoers pondering the motives behind this strategic move.

Scott's meticulous attention to detail and his knack for immersive storytelling are undeniable. His capability to transport audiences to bygone eras, coupled with the ability to recreate historical events with striking authenticity, has been a hallmark of his directorial prowess. It's this very promise of an expansive and vivid retelling of Napoleon's life that makes the decision to truncate the theatrical release somewhat perplexing.

In an era where epic sagas find success in lengthy runtimes, capturing the attention and admiration of audiences willing to invest hours in a compelling narrative, 'Napoleon' seems poised to follow suit. However, the choice to tease audiences with a truncated theatrical version, while undoubtedly stirring interest, risks diluting the grandeur and depth that the complete narrative promises.

Ridley Scott's track record speaks volumes, and 'Napoleon' is poised to be another jewel in his crown. The anticipation, despite the concerns about the truncated theatrical cut, remains palpable. One can only hope that the forthcoming director's cut will deliver the comprehensive, richly detailed epic that fans of historical dramas eagerly await.

In essence, 'Napoleon' stands as a testament to the power of storytelling on the grandest scale, a testament to Scott's vision, yet tinged with a hint of reservation, urging audiences to await the full tapestry of history and emotion that the director's cut is expected to unveil. The allure of the complete, unbridled narrative promises an experience that might transcend mere cinematic entertainment, offering an immersive journey through one of history's most enigmatic figures.

movie review

About the Creator

Suresh Chand

Reader insights


Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2024 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.