The National Assembly (NA) has recently passed several bills without a quorum, sparking controversy and raising questions about the legitimacy of these actions.
A quorum, in parliamentary procedure, is the minimum number of members of a deliberative assembly necessary to conduct the business of that group. In the case of the NA, the quorum required is at least half of the total members plus one. However, recent sessions have seen fewer members present, leading to the passing of bills without the required quorum.
Critics argue that passing bills without a quorum undermines the democratic process and the principle of representation. It means that a bill is being passed without the necessary number of elected representatives present to deliberate and vote on it. This can lead to legislation being passed without proper consideration or debate, and without the input of a significant portion of the assembly.
On the other hand, supporters of the actions argue that the bills passed were urgently needed and that it was not practical to wait for a quorum to be reached. They also point out that the rules of the NA do not explicitly prohibit passing bills without a quorum and that it has been a long-standing practice in the assembly.
Critics argue that passing bills without a quorum undermines the democratic process and the principle of representation. It means that a bill is being passed without the necessary number of elected representatives present to deliberate and vote on it. This can lead to legislation being passed without proper consideration or debate, and without the input of a significant portion of the assembly.
Regardless of one's stance on the matter, it is clear that passing bills without a quorum raises important questions about the legitimacy of the legislative process. It calls into question the representation of the people and the ability of the assembly to effectively deliberate and pass legislation.
In addition, it is also important for citizens to stay informed about the actions of their representatives and hold them accountable for their actions. The passing of bills without a quorum should be brought to the attention of the public and debated, to ensure that the legislative process is open and transparent.
Critics argue that passing bills without a quorum undermines the democratic process and the principle of representation. It means that a bill is being passed without the necessary number of elected representatives present to deliberate and vote on it. This can lead to legislation being passed without proper consideration or debate, and without the input of a significant portion of the assembly.
It is imperative that the National Assembly address this issue and ensure that the democratic process is upheld in all actions. This could be done through amending the rules to explicitly prohibit passing bills without a quorum or through increasing efforts to ensure a quorum is present during sessions.
In addition, it is also important for citizens to stay informed about the actions of their representatives and hold them accountable for their actions. The passing of bills without a quorum should be brought to the attention of the public and debated, to ensure that the legislative process is open and transparent.
In conclusion, the passing of bills without a quorum in the National Assembly raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of the legislative process and the representation of the people. It is crucial that the assembly address this issue and ensure that the democratic process is upheld in all actions. It is also important for citizens to stay informed and hold their representatives accountable for their actions.
About the Creator
Naveed Jamal
Am content creator.
Keep reading
More stories from Naveed Jamal and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Doomsday Clock to be updated on Jan 24
The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic representation of the likelihood of a global catastrophe, such as nuclear war or climate change. It is maintained by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a group of scientists and experts who have been assessing the risks of global catastrophe since 1947.
By Naveed Jamalabout a year ago in The Swamp
Primary Hurdles in Implementing IoT
The predominance of the Internet of Things (IoT) in our daily lives has been so profound that everybody is able to see it. In fact, we are nearer than we suspect to a future where our preferences drive thermostat adjustments, groceries are replenished independently, and traffic is optimized through real-time data examination. This interconnected network of devices, be it smartwatches or industrial sensors, a.k.a. IoT, brings with it the promise of completely transforming our lives. Nevertheless, as beneficial as it is, this interconnected future poses many challenges. What I mean to say is that despite the immense potential of IoT, realizing its benefits requires overcoming plenty of obstacles, ranging from technical complexities to concerns about security and compatibility across various platforms.
By Ryan Williamson7 days ago in The Swamp
High Rise, Deep Impact
I have witnessed a death that I relive every time I step into an elevator. Although it no longer affects me as deeply—given that it's been 11 years since the incident—it remains a heart- rending memory from my first and last day as a paramedic. My initial call to the scene involved a man who seemed to have fallen down the elevator shaft of a high-rise building. Alternatively, it might have been that the elevator moved upwards while he was working on it. Different scenarios were being considered when I arrived.
By Penelope Henain4 days ago in Writers
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.