411 on Event 201

There have been a lot of conspiracy theories and rumors surrounding Event 201. Here is the 411 on Event 201. All of the information stated is what government officials' are allowing the general public to know at this time. Through tedious research, this is the information that has surfaced the web since Event 201 has occurred.

Event 201 took place on October 18, 2019. This event was a call to action by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This event was to bring the world leaders and corporations together to formulate a plan on how to deal with a global pandemic properly. During the event, they formulated seven recommendations for readiness plan but also stated that the world is not adequately prepared for a national pandemic.

The reasoning they called for Event 201 to take place is because, over the past several years, there has been an overwhelming amount of viral attacks on humanity (HIV, SARS, and Ebola) that John Hopkins Center for Health and Security has been following. The call for help from national leaders and corporations took place in August of 2019.

The unknown truth

Through scientific observation, there has been a rise of viruses spilling over into the human population from natural environmental resources. Some of the viruses (not mentioned) found sparked worry amongst the national protectors. Who is said to be: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. These foundations unknowingly amongst the general population put a lot into saving humanity. These foundations are said to study more in-depth into the causes and actions of the government, natural disasters, and big corpora.

About the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security works to protect people from epidemics and disasters and build resilient communities through innovative scholarship, engagement, and research that strengthens the organizations, systems, policies, and programs essential to preventing and responding to public health crises. The Center is part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

About the World Economic Forum: The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperations. They are committed to managing risks associated with emerging infectious diseases of epidemic and pandemic potential through innovative, cross-industry, and cross-sectoral public-private cooperation, strengthening national and global health security.

About the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Guided by the belief that every life has equal value, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation works to help all people lead healthy, productive lives. It focuses on improving people's health and giving them the chance to lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty in developing countries. In the United States, it seeks to ensure that all people—especially those with the fewest resources—have access to the opportunities they need to succeed in school and life. https://globalbiodefense.com/2020/01/20/joint-call-to-action-on-pandemic-preparedness-and-response-7-recommendations-for-readiness/

What are the seven recommendations

Governments, international organizations, and businesses should plan how essential corporate capabilities are utilized during a large-scale pandemic. During a severe pandemic, public sector efforts to control the outbreak are likely to become overwhelmed. However, industry assets, if swiftly and appropriately deployed, could help save lives and reduce economic losses. For instance, companies with operations focused on logistics, social media, or distribution systems will be needed to enable governments' emergency response, risk communications, and medical countermeasure distribution efforts during a pandemic. This includes working together to ensure that strategic commodities are available and accessible for public health response. Contingency planning for a potential operational partnership between government and business will be complex, with many legal and organizational details to be addressed. Governments should work now to identify the most critical areas of need and reach out to industry players to finalize agreements in advance of the next massive pandemic. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board would be well-positioned to help monitor and contribute to the efforts that governments, international organizations, and businesses should take for pandemic preparedness and response.

Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to enable rapid and equitable distribution during a severe pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently has an influenza vaccine virtual stockpile, with contracts in place with pharmaceutical companies that have agreed to supply vaccines should WHO request them. As one possible approach, this virtual stockpile model could be expanded to augment WHO's ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need during a severe pandemic. This should also include any available experimental vaccine stockpiles for any WHO R&D Blueprint pathogens to deploy in a clinical trial during outbreaks in collaboration with CEPI, GAVI, and WHO. Other approaches could involve regional stockpiles or bi- or multinational agreements. During a catastrophic outbreak, countries may be reluctant to part with scarce medical resources. A robust international stockpile could, therefore, help to ensure that low and middle resource settings receive needed supplies regardless of whether they produce such supplies domestically. Countries with national supplies or domestic manufacturing capabilities should commit to donating some supply/product to this virtual stockpile. Countries should support this effort through the provision of additional funding.

Countries, international organizations, and global transportation companies should work together to maintain travel and trade during severe pandemics. Travel and trade are essential to the global economy as well as to national and even local economies, and they should be maintained even in the face of a pandemic. Improved decision-making, coordination, and communications between the public and private sectors, relating to risk, travel advisories, import/export restrictions, and border measures will be needed. The fear and uncertainty experienced during past outbreaks, even those limited to a national or regional level, have sometimes led to unjustified border measures, the closure of customer-facing businesses, import bans, and the cancellation of airline flights and international shipping. A particularly fast-moving and lethal pandemic could result in political decisions to slow or stop the movement of people and goods, potentially harming economies that are already vulnerable in the face of an outbreak. Ministries of Health and other government agencies should work together now with international airlines and global shipping companies to develop realistic response scenarios while starting a contingency plan process to mitigate economic damage by maintaining essential travel and trade routes. Supporting continued trade and travel in such an extreme circumstance may require enhanced disease control measures and personal protective equipment for transportation workers, government subsidies to support critical trade routes, and potential liability protection in some instances. International organizations, including WHO, the International Air Transport Association, and the International Civil Aviation Organization should be partners in these preparedness and response efforts.

Governments should provide more resources and support for the development and surge manufacturing of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. In the event of a severe pandemic, countries may need population-level supplies of safe and effective medical countermeasures, including vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. Therefore, the ability to rapidly develop, manufacture, distribute, and dispense large quantities of MCMs will be needed to contain and control a global outbreak. Countries with enough resources should significantly increase this capability. In coordination with WHO, CEPI, GAVI, and other relevant multilateral and domestic mechanisms, investments should be made in new technologies and industrial approaches, that will allow concomitant distributed manufacturing. This will require addressing legal and regulatory barriers, among other issues.

The global business should recognize the economic burden of pandemics and fight for stronger preparedness. In addition to investing more in preparing their own companies and industries, business leaders and their shareholders should actively engage with governments and advocate for increased resources for pandemic preparedness. Globally, there has been a lack of attention and investment in preparing for high-impact pandemics, and business is mostly not involved in existing efforts, due to a lack of awareness of the business risks posed by a pandemic to a significant extent. Tools should be built to help large private sector companies visualize business risks posed by infectious diseases and pathways to mitigate risk through public-private cooperation to strengthen preparedness. A severe pandemic would significantly interfere with workforce health, business operations, and the movement of goods and services. A catastrophic-level outbreak can also have profound and long-lasting effects on entire industries, the economy, and societies in which business operates. While governments and public health authorities serve as the first line of defense against fast-moving outbreaks, their efforts are chronically under-funded and lack sustained support. Global business leaders should play a far more dynamic role as advocates with a stake in stronger pandemic preparedness.

International organizations should prioritize reducing the economic impacts of epidemics and pandemics. Much of the economic harm resulting from a pandemic is likely due to counterproductive behaviors of individuals, companies, and countries. For example, actions that lead to the disruption of travel and trade or that change consumer behavior can significantly damage economies. In addition to other response activities, an increase in and reassessing pandemic financial support will undoubtedly be needed in a severe pandemic. Many sectors of society may need financial support during or after a severe pandemic, including healthcare institutions, essential businesses, and national governments. Furthermore, how these existing funds can now be used is limited. The International Health Regulations prioritizes minimizing public health risks and avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. However, there will also be a need to identify critical nodes of the banking system and global and national economies that are too essential to fail. Some are likely to need emergency international financial support as well. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, regional development banks, national governments, foundations, and others should explore ways to increase the amount and availability of funds in a pandemic and ensure that they can be used flexibly.

Governments and the private sector should prioritize developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation before the next pandemic response. Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation. This will require developing the ability to flood media with fast, accurate, and consistent information. Public health authorities should work with private employers and trusted community leaders such as faith leaders to promulgate factual information to employees and citizens. Trusted, influential private-sector employers should create the capacity to readily and reliably augment public messaging, manage rumors and misinformation, and amplify credible information to support emergency public communications. National public health agencies should work in close collaboration with (WHO) to create the capability to rapidly develop and release consistent health messages. For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed, including through the use of technology.

https://globalbiodefense.com/2020/01/20/joint-call-to-action-on-pandemic-preparedness-and-response-7-recommendations-for-readiness/

As you can see, this is why we have turned to Bill Gates in the current epidemic as his foundation has been researching what we should do in the case of a real pandemic. It may seem quite suspicious that they have known that a pandemic was bound to occur in the near future, but they have invested there time and money into the research and science to try and keep humanity safe in uncertain times.

The conspiracy

I do not believe that these foundations created COVID-19, but it is believable that this is a mock pandemic with a virus that has always been amongst humans in many nations. This may be a test trial to see what would happen during a global pandemic, as with any scientific study, the theory has to undergo testing. The virus is real, but the significance may be a bit exaggerated. If this theory is correct, that means there is a good chance that the real global pandemic is on its way. Prepare your immune systems and see what you have lacked in this trial to prepare yourselves for the real pandemic better.