Journal logo

What Your Last 12 Instagram Posts Say About Your Music

One viral Reel can make a musician's Instagram numbers look incredible. The posts surrounding it often tell a different story.

By Solution BoxesPublished 5 days ago • 8 min read
What Your Last 12 Instagram Posts Say About Your Music
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

One viral Reel can make a musician's Instagram numbers look incredible. The posts surrounding it often tell a different story.

AI disclosure: This article was drafted with assistance from ChatGPT. The artist and numerical example used below are fictional.

An independent musician uploads an acoustic cover to Instagram on a Tuesday evening. By Friday, the video has attracted more attention than anything else she's published that year. Her follower count rises. People leave encouraging comments, and a few ask what she's planning to record next.

Two weeks later, she releases an original song.

The announcement gets 63 likes.

It's a frustrating result, particularly after watching the cover take off. She starts wondering whether Instagram has stopped showing her content to people. Maybe she posted at the wrong time. Maybe the artwork wasn't interesting enough. Maybe the audience simply prefers covers.

All three explanations are possible. None can be established from two posts.

Consider this a fictional example, but a useful one. Musicians often find themselves evaluating their Instagram performance through whichever post happens to be doing best. One successful video becomes evidence that a strategy works. One disappointing announcement suggests the whole account needs fixing.

A better starting point is to look at the dozen posts surrounding those two moments.

The trouble with a viral cover

Imagine our musician has 4200 followers. Over her last 12 posts, she's shared rehearsal videos, photographs from the studio, a few promotional announcements, and that unusually popular acoustic cover.

Together, those posts received 4204 likes and comments.

Using a standard follower-based engagement calculation, we can estimate her average engagement rate:

4204 interactions ÷ 12 posts ÷ 4200 followers × 100 = 8.34%

That number looks encouraging. But one post, the acoustic cover, was responsible for 2710 of those interactions.

Remove that post and the remaining 11 received 1494 interactions between them.

The calculation changes considerably:

1494 interactions ÷ 11 posts ÷ 4200 followers × 100 = 3.23%

Her average engagement rate falls from 8.34% to 3.23%.

Nothing about her music changed when we removed the cover from the calculation. We simply got a different view of her typical Instagram activity.

There's a second number that helps explain the difference. Across all 12 posts, the median was 144 interactions. That is the middle of the distribution, rather than an average pulled upward by one unusual result.

For an independent musician planning a release, both the average and median deserve attention.

The average captures the benefit of an occasional breakout post. The median helps show what tends to happen when there isn't one.

One limitation matters here: engagement rate by followers is only an estimate of activity relative to audience size. It doesn't tell us how many unique people saw each post, and it doesn't measure music streams or ticket sales.

A cover can reach people who don't know your songs

The acoustic cover wasn't a wasted opportunity. It introduced the musician to people who might never have come across her otherwise.

But enjoying someone's version of a familiar song is different from becoming interested in their original music.

Think about how people discover performances on Instagram. Someone scrolling through Reels recognizes a song, stops, and listens. They might appreciate the voice or guitar playing enough to leave a like. Perhaps they follow the account.

That doesn't mean they're ready to listen to a completely unfamiliar single the following week.

This is where looking beyond total engagement becomes useful.

What happened on the posts featuring original songs? Did anybody ask when those songs would be released? Did people recognize a track from a previous rehearsal clip? Were there conversations about the lyrics, the recording process, or upcoming shows?

Imagine two comments.

Under the popular cover, somebody writes, "Great voice!"

Under an original song preview, another person asks, "Is this the song you played at the Manchester show? I've been waiting to hear it again."

Both are encouraging. The second tells us something more specific about the relationship between the musician and that listener.

It suggests the person remembers an earlier performance and wants to hear the music again.

One comment is hardly enough to build a marketing strategy around. Twenty similar comments across several posts would deserve closer examination.

For an artist trying to develop an audience for original music, these conversations can be more informative than a large number of quick reactions.

What twelve posts can tell you

Twelve is a convenient starting point because it gives you more context than a handful of favorites without requiring months of research.

I wouldn't treat it as a scientifically ideal sample size. A musician publishing every day and another publishing once a month will have very different 12-post histories.

Start with the dates.

If the last dozen posts cover three weeks, you're looking at relatively recent activity. If they cover six months, you may be comparing material published during different stages of the artist's career.

Next, examine what was actually posted.

A band might discover that most of its recent content consists of concert posters and release announcements. A solo artist might find that nine of twelve posts are covers, with very little original music.

Neither pattern is necessarily wrong. But it's difficult to attract people to your own songs if visitors rarely encounter those songs on your profile.

Look at format as well.

Reels, carousels, and photographs create different opportunities for people to interact. A Reel lets somebody hear a performance without visiting another platform. A carousel can show how a song was recorded or explain the story behind a release. A photograph might be enough to announce an upcoming show.

The important detail is the relationship between the format and the reason for posting.

If a rehearsal video gets more comments than a polished promotional image, read the comments before assuming rehearsal videos always perform better.

People may be asking about the microphone, the guitar tone, or an unfinished song. Those are very different conversations.

It's also useful to check how much one exceptional post affects your averages.

JamFeed publishes an Instagram account analyzer for musicians that uses the latest 12 posts from a public profile to calculate follower-based engagement, average and median interactions, posting frequency, and format distribution. Its published methodology also recalculates engagement after removing the top-performing post.

That approach provides a useful starting point for this kind of comparison. The figures still need interpretation, and public-profile reports cannot replace an account owner's private Instagram Insights.

Your own music needs room on your Instagram account

There's a temptation to keep repeating whatever earned the most views.

If covers perform well, make more covers. If a funny backstage video takes off, create another. If a trending sound attracts attention, follow the next trend.

That can be a reasonable way to experiment, but it creates a problem when the content attracting attention has little connection to the music you're hoping people will listen to.

An artist might become recognizable for something other than their songs.

This doesn't mean covers, humor, or behind-the-scenes content should disappear. They can make an account more interesting and give listeners different reasons to follow.

The balance matters.

Consider a songwriter preparing a new single.

Instead of publishing the same promotional artwork repeatedly, she might share a short performance of the chorus, a rehearsal recording, and a photograph with a few sentences explaining where the song came from.

Those posts give people different ways to encounter the same piece of music.

Someone may be interested in the melody. Another person might connect with the lyrics. A fellow musician may want to know how the guitar part was recorded.

The variety comes from the music itself, rather than from finding unrelated material that happens to attract views.

That also gives the artist something more useful to measure.

If several original-song clips attract questions and repeat listeners, she has evidence that at least part of her Instagram audience is interested in the work she's preparing to release.

It won't predict the number of streams. But it's a better basis for planning than copying the previous viral Reel.

Try changing one thing for two weeks

Suppose the musician in our example decides to experiment before her next release.

Her recent posts suggest that rehearsal videos and songwriting clips encourage more detailed comments than conventional announcements.

For the next two weeks, she publishes four pieces of content: two short performances of original material, one behind-the-scenes carousel, and one release announcement.

She keeps the subject focused on the upcoming song.

After publishing, she records the available likes and comments, along with the dates and formats. If she has access to Instagram Insights, she also looks at reach, saves, profile visits, and other relevant metrics.

She doesn't compare a video that's been live for two hours with a post that has accumulated interactions for three weeks. The observation period matters.

Then she reads the comments.

Did the original-song performances lead to questions about the release? Did the behind-the-scenes carousel get people discussing the recording? Did the announcement encourage anybody to visit her profile or listening page?

Four posts won't settle the question. The sample is too small, and plenty of outside factors can affect the results.

But it creates a test she can repeat.

After another dozen posts, she can compare the two periods and see whether the changes are associated with more consistent interaction around her original music.

There is no need to pretend that every fluctuation has a clear explanation.

Sometimes a post performs unusually well because people liked it. Sometimes distribution changes for reasons the artist cannot observe. The data may raise better questions without answering all of them.

Instagram attention and music fans aren't identical

An artist with modest Instagram engagement can still fill a small venue. Another musician might attract thousands of views while struggling to persuade people to listen to a complete song.

The numbers aren't necessarily contradictory.

Instagram records certain types of interaction. Listening to music, attending concerts, buying merchandise, and supporting an artist involve other decisions.

Someone might watch ten of your Reels without ever streaming your latest release. Another listener could discover a song through a friend, follow you on Spotify, and never comment on Instagram.

That's why engagement rate shouldn't be used as a score for an entire music career.

If you're the account owner, Instagram Insights can help explain which posts reached people and what actions followed. Streaming-platform analytics, website referrals, and ticket-sales information provide other pieces of the story.

Even with those measurements, attribution can be difficult. A listener might discover an artist through Instagram and search for the song on Spotify several days later. That journey won't necessarily appear as a neat referral in a dashboard.

The sensible approach is to keep the measurements separate and look for patterns across time.

A rise in Instagram engagement is useful to report. A rise in streaming listeners is another observation. Claiming the first caused the second requires additional evidence.

Before your next release, look back

Return to the fictional musician whose acoustic cover performed so well.

She still has a reason to celebrate it. The video reached people, attracted encouraging responses, and introduced her performance to a larger audience.

But the next step isn't necessarily to make another cover.

She can look through the other 11 posts and ask which ones gave people a reason to become interested in her own music.

Perhaps the behind-the-scenes recording attracted questions. Perhaps an unfinished chorus encouraged followers to ask for the complete song. Maybe the small live performance received fewer views but more responses from people who had already attended a show.

Those are observations she can use when planning the next release.

The process doesn't require an elaborate spreadsheet or a complicated publishing schedule. It starts with a handful of recent posts, some basic arithmetic, and enough attention to the comments to understand what people are responding to.

A viral video is exciting. Enjoy it.

Then look at the posts around it. They might tell you more about what to make next.


how to

About the Creator

Solution Boxes

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Solution Boxes