Shane Ian Murphy on Explaining One Good Idea at a Cambridge Exhibition
A small stand works best when visitors can understand the concept before they hear the pitch.
An exhibition stand has a peculiar working condition: nobody owes it their attention. People arrive carrying bags, questions, unfinished conversations and a rough sense of where they want to go next. I think small companies often make their stands harder to approach by treating every available surface as a chance to explain the entire business. My preference is to give the visitor one useful idea first. If that idea earns a second question, the stand has already begun a worthwhile conversation.
Imagine a fictional Cambridge exhibition where a small company is demonstrating a reusable divider for busy workshop benches. Its central concept is simple: separate a temporary job without rebuilding the whole work area. The company could display a dense wall of specifications, customer categories and optional attachments. Alternatively, it could show one crowded bench, one divider and one clearly separated task. The second arrangement lets a visitor recognise the problem before deciding whether the proposed answer matters.
The stand should therefore begin with a sentence that describes a change somebody can picture. “Give a temporary job its own space” is more useful here than an ambitious claim about transforming productivity. It gives the physical demonstration a purpose. A visitor can look at the bench and test whether the sentence feels accurate. As Shane Ian Murphy, I favour explanations that make a claim available for inspection, because an inspectable claim is a better starting point than an impressive but slippery promise.
The demonstration itself needs a beginning, a visible action and an ending. Start with the bench in its ordinary condition. Introduce the temporary task. Position the divider and show what remains accessible. Then stop. A demonstration that continues through every attachment can lose the central concept beneath its own competence. The team can keep additional pieces nearby for people whose questions justify them. That is not withholding information; it is allowing the visitor's interest to determine which information becomes useful.
A small company also needs to decide where a visitor should stand. This sounds like furniture planning, but it affects the explanation. If the action faces inward, the team may form a private circle around its own product. If the presenter blocks the important movement, the visitor has to work to understand it. I would leave one obvious viewing position and test the demonstration from that position. A colleague who has not rehearsed the presentation can say what they could actually see and what they had to infer.
Questions deserve their own preparation. Someone may ask whether the divider suits a different bench, whether it moves easily or whether it can remain in place overnight. The presenter should connect each answer to the original concept without pretending every application is identical. “Here is the arrangement we can show today” is a confident boundary when accompanied by a clear demonstration. A second person can explore unusual requirements away from the main viewing position, allowing the short explanation to remain available to new arrivals.
I would also resist filling quiet moments with a longer speech. A person looking closely at an object may be thinking, comparing or deciding how to phrase a concern. Giving them a few seconds can be more hospitable than providing another benefit. The presenter can invite action instead: move this section, try the opening, or show where your own task would sit. Participation works when it reveals the concept. It becomes a distraction when it is merely an activity added to keep people near the stand.
After the exhibition, the most useful discussion may concern which parts people understood without assistance. Did visitors immediately recognise the temporary task? Did they mistake the divider for permanent furniture? Which question repeatedly opened a substantive conversation? Those observations can improve the next display. The goal is not to produce one perfect speech that every employee recites. It is to build a reliable route from an unfamiliar object to an understood idea. For a small stand, that route is often the strongest asset in the room.
About the Creator
Shane Murphy
Shane Ian Murphy: co-founder/partner, Tri-Party Tokenisation; founder/CEO, Global Secure Technologies (planned 2027 launch); co-founder/partner, Dual Party Capital. Partner, RougeN International Corp. Formerly of Limitless Mobile.
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.