Death Penalty: Is it effective?

Since random death sentence trials are morally abusive, it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain tangible evidence of the restraining effect of the death penalty to convince strong supporters. The penalty for changing your mind. For crimes punishable by death in a foreign country, such as smuggling or smuggling of illegal drugs, economic crime, or politically motivated violence, there is no credible evidence of a deterrent effect. Experts who treat the death penalty with the death penalty, and in some cases drug-related crime worldwide, say that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the death penalty has a detrimental effect. Although the death penalty for crimes against humanity has been mentioned in many religious texts and has been widely used by religious leaders throughout history, today there is no consensus on the death penalty among religious sects or denominations.

San Marino became the first European country to abolish the death penalty in 1865; at the beginning of the 20th century, many other countries, including the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Italy followed suit (although under the fascist regime of Benito Mussolini) they were repatriated to Italy). Before this, various charges, including common theft, were punishable by death, although this sentence did not always work, because the judges usually acquitted the defendant of less serious charges.

In 2000, Illinois Governor George Ryan imposed a suspended sentence after the release of 13 people since 1977. Following in the footsteps of Emperor Ryan and after a thorough investigation, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed a law abolishing the death penalty. . in 2011. In 1996, in response to a public outcry over a speedy assassination, Congress severely restricted access to the federal habeas corpus and cut off any penalty money from the regional head "service centers" tasked with providing legal counsel in state courts.

Contrary to popular belief, a person's death is more expensive than imprisonment for the rest of his life. The more the trial changes the penalty for crime - both in terms of time and certainty - the ban will be reduced.

Cardinal Avery Dulles drew attention to another issue of defense. There is no evidence to support the claim that the death penalty is more effective than the prevention of violent crimes, such as life imprisonment.

In the case of the death penalty, the data are not very clear, and at first glance, it seems that murder is associated with a higher, lower, murder rate, as evidenced by incarceration. The authors point to strong evidence supporting this: In 2007, homicide rates in provinces that still used the death penalty were at least 42 percent higher than in the previous states.

The authors report that 88.2% of respondents believe that the death penalty prevents murder - a level of consensus compared with the agreement between scientists on global climate change. At the same time, many believe that the death penalty is not based on racial neutrality, does not prevent people from committing serious crimes, and does not have sufficient guarantees to prevent the killing of an innocent person. Nine out of ten death penalty activists say it is morally justified to commit a crime such as murder; only a quarter of opponents of the death penalty consider it morally appropriate.

A recent study by Professor Michael Radelet and Tracy Lacock of the University of Colorado found that 88% of South Africa's leading intelligence scientists do not believe that the death penalty is an effective way to prevent crime. Professor Fagan argued that the comparative figures for drug-related crimes in Singapore and Indonesia compared to death sentences do not indicate a detrimental effect. Professor Fagan "described in-depth research showing that offenders are more likely to be more prone to incarceration than increased penalties, which means that possible kidnappings are a more effective deterrent than potential death," writes Lynch.

Evidence that the death penalty is a different way of preventing murder is very important, as prevention is one of the most important issues on the part of supporters of the death penalty. We do not question whether the threat of punishment often leads to crime or whether there should be the severe death penalty. However, this foundation does not oblige to support the death penalty; this requires that some offenses be punished with imprisonment or some lesser offenses than those used in the death penalty. It only requires that the most serious cases be given the most severe punishment our behavior allows us to place.

However, in addition to reducing the tax burden on taxpayers, maintaining not only a sense of justice but also its implementation of a system of penalties, is perhaps the greatest measurement tool for those who wish to promote all moral and ethical standards. in their conduct. ... and the obvious contempt for other people. Only by betraying a murderer can society guarantee that convicted murderers are no longer murderers.

The death penalty is a very important motive for limiting the imitation of the most serious crimes, especially murder. Prevention The death penalty is often justified by arguing that by killing convicted murderers, we will ban potential murderers from killing people. No one knows that the death penalty is more than a life sentence. Prevention is most effective when punishment is administered immediately after a crime has been committed - for example, a child learns not to put his or her finger in the fire because the result is immediate pain.

In some lands, death sentences are handed down as compulsory sentences in certain cases, meaning that the judges cannot consider the circumstances of the case or the defendant before sentencing. Some countries kill people under the age of 18 during the crime, some use the death penalty for people with mental and emotional disabilities, and many others use the death penalty after an unfair trial, in clear violation of the law in other countries as well. standards.

People may spend years on the death list, not knowing when their term will end, or whether they will see their families for the last time. Every day, people are killed and executed by the state as punishment for various crimes, sometimes because they do not carry a criminal record. Countries that use the death penalty often use the death penalty as a precautionary measure against crime.

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Numerous evidence shows that the death penalty is far more effective than imprisonment for preventing murder, and it can further aggravate criminal violence. Take Canada as an example. Before the death penalty was abolished in 1976, there were 3 murders per 100,000 people. Since then, the rate has dropped slightly to 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003.