Futurism logo

The Machine That Writes While I Talk

How Voice Dictation Changed My Relationship with Words

By Nolan ReedPublished 8 days ago 8 min read

There was a time when writing meant sitting down with a blank page and waiting for the right words to show up. The blank page had a certain power over a person. It could make me feel talented one minute and completely fraudulent the next. A sentence might come quickly, followed by ten minutes of staring at the same two words, and sometimes the whole thing seemed to depend on whether I could get past the first paragraph. These days, I can skip the blank page altogether. I can talk, and my phone listens. Within seconds, my words appear on the screen.

The first time I used voice dictation seriously, I thought it felt a little ridiculous. I was sitting alone, talking to a rectangle in my hand as though I were leaving a message for somebody who lived inside it. Then I looked at the screen and saw my words sitting there. They were rough and needed punctuation. A few words had been misunderstood, and some sentences wandered around like they had forgotten where they were going. Still, they were there. I had spoken them, and a machine had written them down. That small trick has changed my daily life more than I expected.

I write a lot. Stories, poems, essays, memories, pieces about Appalachia, travel, food, family, aging, marriage, and all the strange little things that catch my attention during the day often begin in different ways. Sometimes a sentence sits in my head for several hours. Other times an image or a memory keeps bothering me until I finally have to do something with it. Years ago, I would have needed to sit down and type before I could turn any of those thoughts into something usable. Now I can be walking through the day and suddenly think, “I need to remember this,” and my phone takes over from there.

I can speak a paragraph while walking around the house, dictate an idea while sitting in the car before heading somewhere, or capture a thought before it disappears into the pile of everything else competing for attention. The whole process still feels a little like science fiction. I grew up in western North Carolina in a time when a telephone sat in one place with a cord attached to it. If somebody wanted to reach you, they called the house. If you were away, they waited. Telephones had one job, and computers were something other people used. A machine that could listen to a person speak and turn those sounds into written language would have seemed like something from a movie. Now I carry one around in my pocket.

The strange part is how quickly the impossible becomes boring. That may be the real revolution. We tend to think of technological revolutions as giant events, so we picture laboratories, rockets, computers filling entire rooms, and people announcing some astonishing breakthrough while cameras record the moment. The changes that affect daily life often happen much more quietly. A new feature appears on a phone, people try it, people keep using it, and eventually nobody thinks much about it. That is what happened with voice dictation for me. At first, I treated it like a novelty. Then it became useful. Eventually, it became a habit.

Now I catch myself speaking ideas into my phone before I have even decided whether they deserve to become a story. That changes the relationship between thought and writing. Typing forces me to slow down, and sometimes that helps. It can also make me overly concerned with the sentence in front of me. I might change a word three times before getting to the next sentence, start worrying about whether the opening works, or decide the whole idea is terrible before I have given it enough time to become anything. Speaking bypasses some of that. I can tell the machine the story first and worry about editing later.

That separation has become valuable. The first version can be messy and rambling, with one sentence that goes nowhere and another that suddenly turns into something worth keeping. The machine has no opinion about any of this. It listens, and there is something liberating about that. A blank screen can feel judgmental even though a screen has no feelings. A machine waiting for words can make a writer feel as if every sentence needs to earn its place before it even exists. Talking feels different because I can wander, change my mind halfway through a sentence, and tell myself what I am trying to say. Sometimes that is how I discover what I am trying to say in the first place.

There is another change I never expected. Speaking makes writing feel closer to conversation. When I type, I can slip into what I think of as “writer voice,” that slightly polished version of myself that starts looking for better words than the ones I would actually use. When I talk, that becomes harder. My voice carries my natural rhythm and the phrases I grew up hearing. It carries the Appalachian part of me that can disappear when I start trying too hard to sound like a writer.

That has become important to me because I want my writing to sound like a person, a real person who grew up in a three-room house in western North Carolina and later spent years writing about the people, places, memories, food, family stories, and strange pieces of life that stayed with him. Voice dictation gives me a way to hear that person before I begin editing him. The machine writes down what I say, and then I become the editor. Those two jobs feel increasingly separate.

The machine is fast. I am slow. The machine catches most of the words, while I decide which words deserve to remain. That division of labor has changed how I think about technology. I used to assume technology was valuable when it made people faster. Now I think some technology becomes valuable when it gives people a different way to work. Voice dictation does not make me a better writer. It gives me another doorway into writing, and there are days when typing feels like work while talking feels easy. On those days, the phone becomes a bridge between the thought in my head and the story I want to tell.

Sometimes I dictate several paragraphs and forget about them for a few hours. Later, I read them and find plenty of garbage. Some passages contain a sentence I like, and every now and then there is a piece of writing hiding inside the mess that I could have lost entirely if I had waited for myself to sit down and type it. That possibility keeps me using it. I never know which thought will turn into something worth keeping, so capturing the thought gives it a chance.

There is also something strange about realizing how much of my life now exists as language stored inside a machine. Ideas that once lived for a few minutes inside my head can become text. Memories can become paragraphs. A thought that might have vanished while I was driving can become the beginning of a story. The technology is changing my relationship with memory as well as writing. For most of my life, remembering something meant carrying it around in my head until I could write it down. Now I can capture it almost immediately.

That sounds wonderful, and it also makes me wonder what we lose when every thought becomes recordable. A fleeting thought used to disappear. A bad idea could die peacefully. A memory could remain private simply because nobody bothered to write it down. Now almost anything can be captured. The machine is always ready, and that creates its own temptation. Write this down. Record that. Save this thought. Keep that sentence. We have gained an extraordinary ability to preserve things, yet preservation can become another form of clutter.

My phone can hold thousands of sentences, and I cannot remember what half of them say. The technology has created another job for me. I have to decide what deserves to survive. That may be one of the most human parts of the whole process. The machine can store words, yet it cannot decide which memory deserves my attention. It can recognize speech, yet it cannot know why a sentence hurts. It can turn a spoken thought into text, yet it cannot know whether that thought belongs in a finished story. Those decisions remain mine.

For all the talk about machines replacing writers, my experience has been almost the opposite. The machine has made me more aware of the part of writing that belongs to me. I choose the memory. I choose the subject. I choose the sentence that stays and the sentence that gets cut. I decide when a piece is finished. The machine simply gives me a faster way to get the raw material onto the page. That feels remarkably futuristic for something I use while sitting around in my own house.

Sometimes I think about what the younger version of me would have thought if somebody had told him that one day he could carry a device smaller than a paperback that could listen to him speak and turn his voice into written words. He probably would have laughed, then he would have wanted one. That is the funny thing about science fiction. We imagine the future arriving with a trumpet blast. Instead, it slips into our lives through an update. One day a new button appears, you tap it, you speak, and words appear. A few months later, you cannot remember how you worked before it.

That is how the future gets in. It rarely announces itself. It becomes a habit. For me, the habit has changed more than the way I write. It has changed the way I notice ideas. I am more willing to follow a thought because capturing it requires so little effort. A sentence can become a paragraph, a paragraph can become a story, and a story can become something I send out into the world. All because I talked to a machine for a few minutes.

That still amazes me. The device itself has become almost invisible in my daily routine. I pick it up, I speak, and the words appear. There is nothing dramatic about it, and that may be the most remarkable part. Science fiction has become mundane. The machine sits there waiting for me to talk, and I do. Again and again, I give it my memories, my half-formed ideas, my stories, my complaints, my observations, my Appalachian phrases, my sentences that need work, and the occasional sentence that surprises me. It writes them down, and then I take over. For now, that feels like a pretty good partnership between a man and a machine.

artificial intelligencetech

About the Creator

Nolan Reed

I write true stories, including unsolved mysteries and events that actually happened.

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Nolan Reed