Futurism logo

I Was Sure I Needed a Reader From My Own City. A Stranger Two Provinces Away Proved Me Wrong.

We tend to trust the reader down the street more than the one we've never met. After years of assuming location mattered, here's what I found actually does — and what turned out to be pure romance.

By Enrique MartinezPublished 9 days ago • 4 min read
A reading is a conversation, wherever the voice on the other end happens to live.

For a long time I had a rule I never bothered to question: if I ever wanted a proper reading, it had to be someone from here. Someone who knew the city, ideally someone I could reach the way you reach a hairdresser or a dentist — a name a friend passed along, a place with an address. There's a whole mythology around that idea, especially in a place like Barcelona, where every barrio seems to have had, at some point, a woman in a back room who "just knew things." I liked that story. I trusted it without ever asking why.

Then a friend, half as a joke, sent me toward someone she'd spoken with who lived nowhere near either of us — two provinces away, a voice on a screen. I went in skeptical and a little embarrassed. And the reading was, quietly, one of the more useful conversations I'd had that year. So I've spent a while since then trying to figure out what I actually got wrong.

Does a local reader understand you better?

This was the assumption I was most attached to, and it's the one that fell apart fastest. I had imagined that someone from my own city would somehow read me better — that shared streets meant shared context, and shared context meant a sharper reading.

But sit with it and the logic thins out. A reading isn't a survey of your neighborhood. It's a conversation about what you're carrying — a decision you keep circling, a relationship that won't resolve, a fog you can't name. None of that has a postcode. The reader two provinces away didn't know my city, and it didn't matter for a second, because she wasn't reading my city. She was listening to me. What made the difference was attention and the right questions, and those don't ship from a fixed address.

If anything, I noticed the opposite of what I expected. A stranger with no local reference points couldn't lean on assumptions. She had to ask. And being asked, plainly, "what do you actually want here?" turned out to be worth more than any amount of hometown familiarity.

So what does location still change?

I don't want to swing too far and pretend place is meaningless, because a couple of practical things genuinely do shift when the reader isn't around the corner.

The first is language, and I mean it more precisely than "do you both speak Spanish." A city like Barcelona is bilingual in its bones; the way someone phrases comfort or doubt carries a texture. If a particular turn of phrase matters to you, it's worth knowing whether the person on the other end will catch it or let it slide past. That's not about their province — it's about fit, and fit is worth checking before you settle in.

The second is simply presence — being awake, unhurried, and actually available when the conversation happens. A reading you take standing in a doorway, half-distracted, gives you less regardless of who's on the line. That's on you, not on geography.

Everything else I used to file under "local advantage" turned out to be things I could check directly no matter where the reader sat: how they describe their approach, what past visitors say about how a session with them actually feels, whether they explain what a reading is for before it starts. On the directories I looked through afterward — Astroideal was one of them — the useful signal was never the reader's city. It was whether their page told you honestly how they work, so you could tell in advance whether their style fit yours.

The part nobody likes to admit

Here's the honest bit. Part of why I clung to the local reader wasn't practicality at all. It was romance. The beaded curtain, the back room, the sense that a real reading belonged to a place with a smell and a chair that wobbled. That image is lovely and it sold me for years, and it has almost nothing to do with whether the reading itself is any good.

Which brings me to the limits, because a reading — near or far, famous barrio or anonymous screen — can only do so much, and pretending otherwise is how people get hurt. A reading won't tell you the future. It won't make a hard choice for you or hand you a fact about someone else's private life. And it is not a substitute for real help: if what's underneath the question is anxiety that won't lift, grief that's swallowing you, or anything medical, legal, or financial with real weight, a reader is not the person for it, however warm the conversation. A good one will say so themselves. Proximity doesn't change any of that. A reader ten minutes from your flat is bound by exactly the same limits as one you'll never meet in person.

I still love the idea of the neighborhood mystic. I've just stopped confusing the story I love with the thing that actually helps. What helped, in the end, was a stranger who asked good questions and had no idea what my street looked like — and honestly, I don't think she needed to.

Updated: September 2026

astronomy

About the Creator

Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.

Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed.

Subscribe For Free

Reader insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment
    Written by Enrique Martinez