CITEWATCH CITATION LIBRARY

Federal ID Numbers

#76-0733147

#41-2170707

Run Code #: 2026170007 Article Event Number #:002 Beat of Occur #:300(A)dam Beat Unit Assigned #300(A)dam Reporting Agent Badge Number #:28865

Occurrence: Musical Instrument Performance for in house, closed rehearsal event

Target : 4519 W. Lake Street, Chicago, IL Subject: Minister Seymour Run Time : 1730 hours

AGENT SUMMARY

On the above date and time, as indicated in the CiteWatch quarter introductory report, this R/Agt motioned to deliver musical instrument performance support for the above aforementioned. This article is being published with "motioned" because Wednesday 15 July 2026 between the hours of #300(A)dam patrol shift, Subject sent text message via mobile to #300(A)dam for agreement. This R/Agt reports agreeing to rendezvous, during patrol shift hours per live report Run Date stamp, w/$20 Contributed Gift.

This R/Agt denied fulfillment

Fact Report

For a near two month stretch on this supposed necessity, the subject always seem to be delayed in response to requested gift deliveries, yet expounding on current business establishment. But yet the leader of an R&B/Gospel Group rehearsing at such location, not providing adequacy for fulfillment did not assertively digest pure sincerity of attending presence of this R/Agt for such performance, nor did the subject intend to provide monetary contribution, allowing allegation of inappropriate performances and lack of monetary contribution here of. Comes as no surprise, someone of this individual stature would make attempt at mocking talent in unnecessary competition and worthless energy. I believe such mockery to be pure famish on the Subject 's behalf. Negligence should never be an intrusion of service especially when the service is Raw Talent Delivery. An Intellectual Product not property. So I mean there was totally just a bunch of musical instrumentalists, subject and myself included, bonding together in a free festive occasion for memory of a rehearsal benefitting whose setting?

When I serve the Subject, the subject will be served with impartial dignity. Because a person carrying a spiritual title sometimes just need spiritual guidance. There's no such thing as a spiritual bully, so purposely neglecting to compensate any raw talent on any level is forbidden in the world of leadership. It's the role musicians all play. Whether to fans or inspiration we all know our role. It's not about favoritism, or being one sided it's talent being shown appreciation. If the individual which this talent serve cannot appropriately show the necessary moderate appreciation for raw talent delivery, well what would the subject do, rehearsing alone? Make it work!

TIME : Contributing Time Require Shown Appreciation,

Shown appreciation does not infer, telling a raw talent, you won't compensate even if it is for just one hour

Wasn't like I requested $150, now this is a payment. Jesus, don't throw embers at me. Time is of the essence, if readers remember what occurred during this live report run time, it wasn't pretty. Due to underlying health conditions and commuting by public transportation, the outdoor atmosphere didn't allow such rendezvous. Fortunately for me, as I said, when using this medium to publish a written citation full ownership is legally culpable. Agents who compose citations directly in Create Story feature of this platform, are privileged at fulfilling sworn duty. Protecting the United States first Amendment: Freedom of Speech. So what is delivered here, is a negligence report of a subject holding a Religious Spiritual Authoritative Title & Impressionable Talent, one should never defame the character of similar with the effect of negligence and punitive treatment when there's really no legal binding in any of these performances, plus liability. Least could have occurred was offered transportation to the event, though it wasn't pre-planned, I'm pretty sure the Subject was aware of the current outdoor setting. You don't drive and don't pay attention. You can drive long distance in a half of a block business structure, so why the extended courtesy offered transportation, other than city transit commute would have been suitable, but wasn't provided. To listen to banter of improper music instrumental delivery performance during an in house, closed rehearsal and punctuality delivery punitive verbatim allegations is bound under the he say (hearsay) act. And for lack of $20 or even $30 payments with invoice attempts it would have taken four months to borrow advances on these business expositions. The fact the Subject admitted to pay the requested for 7/16 contributions for this event does not render total contribution necessity because during the past of these events, no real documentation cover events, the location isn't zoned for such invoicing which would constitute building violations for such activity.

By ultimate Arbitrary decision the Subject was already denied, basis of previous interactions, proven to be somewhat redundant.

Chief Sanders - LIVE REPORT AGENT