Aloha President Trump
Complaints of War Crimes from Princess of Hawai'i
Claim & Complaint of Breach of Treaties & Request to End War of Occupation
Notice and Claim of the Returning Sovereign of the Hawaiian Kingdom; Reminder of Perpetual Treaty Obligations; Complaint of Breaches of Treaties; Complaints of Genocide, Persistent Systematic War Crimes, and Grave Human Rights Violations and Request for Enquiry; Complaints Against 43 CFR Part 50 Procedures; Request for an Interim Measure of Protection; Request to Acknowledge the "Temporarily Occupied Hawaiian Kingdom" and Reject the "State of Hawaii"; Request for Meeting to Discuss Reaffirmation of Treaty Friendship and Prompt Reparations and Restitutions; and Request to End War of Occupation and Restore the Hawaiian Kingdom
Aloha e from the Hawaiian Kingdom President Donald J. Trump,
I am Princess Ku’uleialoha of the Hawaiian Islands, of the hereditary monarchical government of the temporarily occupied Hawaiian Kingdom. I am Her Royal Highness The Princess of the Hawaiian Islands, a hereditary public official of the de jure government, and the highest-ranking royal person in the Kingdom, please find my credentials here.
According to our mutual bilateral Treaties, the Constitution of the United States, the Rule of Law, and Customary International Law, this message is an urgent legal notice requesting prompt action and good faith performance for a pacific settlement of the complaints herein.
And this is a formal request to reaffirm our Treaty commitments to each other for perpetual peace and friendship, and respect for the obligations arising from our Treaties. I come to you as legal BFFs (best friends forever) and ask for your honorable response. Articles of Arrangement, "Article 1. The peace and friendship subsisting between the United States, and their Majesties, the Queen Regent, and Kauikeaouli, King of the Sandwich Islands, and their subjects and people, are hereby confirmed, and declared to be perpetual."
I am an "heir and successor" with perfect rights and full powers to enforce treaties with the United States and countries worldwide. These Treaties are perpetual and binding to "heirs and successors" of the signatory monarchs. Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, December 20, 1849, "Article 1. There shall be perpetual peace and amity, between the United States of America, and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, His Heirs and Successors."
My Great6 Grandfather King Kamehameha I founded the hereditary Hawaiian Kingdom; I am a Princess, and a close relative and heir to every monarch. As the highest-ranking royal person, I am the de jure returning Sovereign. My credentials as a Princess and heir and successor to the hereditary Hawaiian Kingdom is my genealogy, prepared by the State of Hawaii Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. Please find my genealogy, birth certificates, and government records from me to King Kamehameha I at my website.
I have complaints about war crimes and illegal administrations of the belligerent occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States of America. Complaints that are continuous since 1893 and amount to countless grave breaches and gross violations of Treaties, Customary International Law, the Rule of Law, and Human Rights, including the right not to be a victim of genocide, not to be conscripted into the United States's wars, unlawful annexation, forced citizenship and allegiance, deprivation of sovereign nationality and identity and self-determination, and so much more than can fit here. Hawai’i is not a legally formed state of the United States; it is a sovereign kingdom under war by the United States in a prolonged belligerent military occupation since 1893. A formal administrative investigation and a tribunal are appropriate, legally required, and hereby requested of you.
As a “Protected Person” and as a Princess of this hereditary monarchy, I am entitled to respect for my family rights and honor, and recognition of my status, rank, and title, and to a salary paid from public revenues as a de jure "public official." I am entitled to the economic, social, and cultural rights thereof, including the right to reside in the monarch's private residence, 'Iolani Palace, and I claim and demand all these rights. By the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (GC), Article 27 and the Laws of War of the United States, I am entitled to your recognition of my family right to my royal title and official public rank. My status may not be altered, and I am entitled to a salary as the only de jure public official of the Kingdom since Queen Lili’uokalani died in 1917. I hereby request a salary appropriate to my rank forthwith.
Occupied Territory. The population of an occupied territory, like other protected persons under the GC, are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honor, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs (Law of War Manual (LOWM), 2016, US Department of Defense, page 775).
11.21.1 Continued Service of Judges and Other Public Officials. The Occupying Power may not alter the status of public officials or judges in the occupied territories (LOWM, page 823).
11.21.3 Salaries of Public Officials. The salaries of civil officials of the hostile government who remain in the occupied territory and continue the work of their offices, especially those who can properly continue it under the circumstances arising out of the war – such as judges, administrative or police officers, and officers of city or communal governments – are paid from the public revenues of the occupied territory, until the military government has reason wholly or partially to dispense with their services, (LOWM, page 824).
The United States and you, Mr. President, are required by many laws to have legal relations with the occupied nation's temporarily ousted sovereign authority and public officials like me. However, you and the United States have not done so since the death of Queen Lili'uokalani in 1917. You are legally required to have relations with the temporarily ousted sovereign authority to allow for reconciliation and complaints, to lawfully administer the belligerent occupation, for pacific settlement of disputes, to allow for the rights of the Sovereign, to make peace, and to provide for an end to a war legally defined as "temporary" that has been excessively and unlawfully prolonged for 127 years. “But the Federal Government has not maintained a formal government-to-government relationship with the Native Hawaiian community as an organized, sovereign entity” (43 CFR Part 50 Procedures for Reestablishing a Formal Government-to-Government Relationship With the Native Hawaiian Community (Procedures)).
As the highest-ranking royal person, I am the de jure temporarily ousted sovereign authority and the Head of State of the Hawaiian Kingdom's hereditary monarchical government. I claim the Crown and Throne of the Hawaiian Islands by hereditary and legal rights. There is no current recognized “sovereign authority" nor any public officials of the Hawaiian Kingdom, and there has been none since the death of Queen Lili'uokalani. As such, you have legal duties to me, and I ask that you properly honor and fulfill your obligations. Including your fiduciary duty as a Protective Power over me as a Head of State within your protection by providing me with a Secret Service attachment for my safety. This Claim puts me, my family, and my property at risk of retaliation, harassment, and assassination. King Kalākaua and Crown Princess Ka’iulani were medically murdered by American insurgents (The Last Illness and Death of Hawai‘i’s King Kalākaua: A New Historical/Clinical Perspective).
“You will be attacked for trying to change anything” President Donald J. Trump, Trump Never Give Up: How I Turned My Biggest Challenges Into Success.
United States Code 18 U.S. Code § 3056. Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service: (a) Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons: (5) Visiting heads of foreign states or foreign governments.
This is an exceptionally prolonged, illegally administered occupation of 127 years, accruing an exhaustive amount to say and war crimes to complain against and hundreds of thousands of pages of documents. I have compiled some of the documents and sources of law, including my citations, for your convenience, along with a copy of this letter with live links at http://princesskuuleialoha.com/noticetrump
The complete genocide of full-blooded Hawaiians is imminent, there are less than a mere 8,000 survivors estimated. We have been ignored for too long, and the law has been ignored for too long as well. I am asking you, Mr. President, to make this right by honoring the Constitution you swore to uphold and for the love of your fellow humans. I am asking you, Mr. President, to make history. To solidify yourself in United States history by doing the right thing and ending this farce and war against us, and make history-setting peace with the Princess of the Hawaiian Islands.
Allowing Congress and the United States to commit the gravest and grossest war crimes with impunity and to commit a persistence of human rights violations for over 127 years is a threat to the peace of the entire world. It is a threat to world peace and to every other "peaceful and friendly" nation of Earth. It is a hypocrisy that undermines the people's confidence in the United States's government and is anathema to its founding principles. It is time to restore honor for the rule of law governing the conduct of nations and assure accountability and justice and redress for the Hawaiian victims of war crimes and genocide. "Without justice, there can be no peace," Martin Luther King, Jr.
I assert my claims and legal rights. As a princess, and an heir, and successor, and as the sovereign authority of my family's monarchy, I have perfect rights and full powers to enforce perpetual treaties and your friendship and duties legally in court. To ignore me and my rights is to continue to ignore a nation and a race of people and the law; ignoring me is sanctioning our genocide and participating in the denial of our inherent human rights. And it is grounds for lawsuits. I hope that we all would rather not go there but can instead resolve things amicably between us. But, as I am sure you can understand, this cause is urgent, and I will not falter in my pursuit of justice. If you give me no response, I must proceed with court action and as much media and public attention as I can gather in our defense. I pray for your gracious and swift response.
The time has come to acknowledge and hear the legal voice of the Hawaiian Kingdom and take responsibility for over a century of war crimes.
As a royal Princess of a hereditary monarchy, I have the right to my family honor and title and official public position and voice for the Protected People of the temporarily occupied Hawaiian Kingdom. I am entitled to the economic, social, and cultural rights thereof, and I claim and demand all these rights. To deny me these rights, to ignore me and this message, constitutes new war crimes. To acknowledge what God, ancestors,and the law have bestowed is an affirmation of your promise to uphold the Constitution of the United States, to work out disagreements peacefully, to try for a world of peace and justice and freedom for all.
“It's always good to be underestimated,” President Trump.
I ask that you righteously honor your oath to the Constitution and the perpetual treaties of friendship and peace between the United States and the Hawaiian Kingdom.
Article VI, Clause 2. This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding (The Constitution of the United States, 1787).
I am asking you for your aloha for Hawaiians. Aloha is many things; a few are love, mercy, compassion, and regards. I am asking you to stand for us now. "Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world," Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor," Desmond Tutu. Are you on the side of the oppressor or justice and the law? Please stand for Hawaiians now. We need fulfillment of your oath promising friendship and peace.
I request a formal administrative fact-finding mission to investigate the implications of the United States’s settlements on the Hawaiian people's civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights since the illegal overthrow of the monarchy to the present.
I request an interim measure of protection from ongoing war crimes and a neutral party to replace the United States as the administrator of the belligerent military occupation due to innumerable persistent systematic war crimes, countless ignored complaints and requests for compliance with International Law and United States Law, and denial of recourse and remedy. All the Protected Persons of the Hawaiian Kingdom do not now, nor have ever benefited from the activities of the United States as Protecting Power and are, in fact, barely surviving your systematic genocide of us, a “peaceful and friendly people,” as according to GCIV.
SUBSTITUTES FOR PROTECTING POWERS ARTICLE 11. When persons protected by the present Convention do not benefit or cease to benefit, no matter for what reason, by the activities of a Protecting Power or of an organization provided for in the first paragraph above, the Detaining Power shall request a neutral State, or such an organization, to undertake the functions performed under the present Convention by a Protecting Power designated by the Parties to a conflict (GCIV).
… an "act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress", and acknowledged that by such acts the government of a peaceful and friendly people was overthrown; Senate Joint Resolution 19 - A joint resolution to acknowledge the 100th anniversary of the January 17, 1893 overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and to offer an apology to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii (Apology Resolution).
The facts of the illegal overthrow and occupation are a matter of Public Law and historical records. Mr. President, it is your duty to be knowledgeable about the entire issue so that you can be compliant with the law and your oath of office, including Apology Resolution.
The "State” of Hawai’i was fraudulently formed against International Laws and United States Law; thus, it is void, and Hawaiians are not United States citizens. We were unlawfully annexed by Congress, as I know you know (you correctly pointed out that the fraudulent “President” Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate renders him ineligible and thus his term was illegal), so please let us skip games and further pretenses otherwise and get real with each other.
There has never been a Treaty of Annexation nor one of Peace signed by the lawful, de jure government of the Hawaiian Kingdom. But you can change that and indelibly engrave yourself in world history.
“The Bible tells us, “how good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity” and “We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity,” President Trump, Inaugural Address, 2017. “Problems are often opportunities coming at us in packaging that isn’t what we expect or want” and “Take blips in stride—instead of trying to deflect problems or obstacles and send them off in another direction, try to embrace them. Turn them into something positive” President Trump, Trump Never Give Up: How I Turned My Biggest Challenges into Success.
11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory. The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power (LOWM, page 754).
COMMENTARY OF 1958 ARTICLE 47 -- INVIOLABILITY OF RIGHTS (1) As long as hostilities continue the Occupying Power cannot therefore annex the occupied territory, even if it occupies the whole of the territory concerned. A decision on that point can only be reached in the peace treaty (GCIV).
11.3.1 End of Occupation. … However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory, (LOWM, page 770).
I have come to understand that the lawful political status of the Hawaiian Islands is that of a sovereign nation-state in continuity; but a nation-state that is under a strange form of occupation by the United States resulting from an illegal military occupation and a fraudulent annexation. As such, international laws (the Hague and Geneva Conventions) require that governance and legal matters within the occupied territory of the Hawaiian Islands must be administered by the application of the laws of the occupied state (in this case, the Hawaiian Kingdom), not the domestic laws of the occupier (the United States). (Memorandum from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Dr. Alfred M. deZayas, 2018).
In 2016 an acknowledgment was made through the Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary, that “a working relationship between government officials is absent.” in 43 CFR Part 50 Procedures for Reestablishing a Formal Government-to-Government Relationship With the Native Hawaiian Community (Procedures). I have too many complaints about Procedures to fit in this letter; it is illegal in every way, gravely violating the Constitution and International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, and compliance is prohibitively expensive. It is yet another of over 150 acts by Congress that are, in the words of Representative Thomas H. Ball of Texas, “a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which cannot be lawfully done.”
Procedures require that the “Native Hawaiian community decide what form of government to adopt” and draft a “governing document.” However, the only choice of what kind of government to adopt allowed is their one prescribed form, “That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens; as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. What is DEMOCRACY?” https://thelawdictionary.org/democracy/
People may not form a new government nor ratify a new “governing document,” that would be treason. “1. Treason is hereby defined to be any plotting or attempt to dethrone or destroy the King, or the levying of war against the King’s government, or the adhering to the enemies thereof,” Penal Code of the Hawaiian Islands. And providing Procedures as a means to commit treason is also treason and is an act of multiple war crimes including violation of Article 43 of the Hauge Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land 1907, to respect the laws in force in the occupied nation, and LOWM 11.4.2 on the inability of the occupying power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.
Trying to force the people to overthrow the existing constitution themselves, but only into the one prescribed form of democracy, does not allow them a choice, so it is more war crimes of deprivation of self-determination and refusal to respect the sovereign government. It is just another blatant way to try to keep evading the law. None can escape the law forever.
Procedures violate the rights of the existing hereditary Sovereign. The Hawaiian Islands is a hereditary monarchy with a voluntary constitution, temporarily suspended under the law, not abolished. A monarchy is a “government in which the supreme power is vested in a single person,” https://thelawdictionary.org/monarchy/. The only legal representative of the de jure monarchical government of the Hawaiian Islands is “a single person,” the Monarch.
97 See, e.g., VON GLAHN, THE OCCUPATION OF ENEMY TERRITORY 31 (“The consensus of the opinions of writers on international law is that the legitimate government of the territory retains its sovereignty but that the latter is suspended during the period of belligerent occupation.”), (LOWM, page 772).
The 1864 Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands allows for elections only for the House of Representatives, the larger part of the unicameral Legislative Assembly. The smaller part is the House of Nobles, and the Monarch appoints the nobles. Hawaiian Kingdom laws do not provide for an election by the whole public body of subjects for any other office nor for the hereditary position of Monarch/Sovereign, unlike the requirements of Procedures, which mandate that the Sovereign and every government official be voted in by citizens.
From the 1864 Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands, “ARTICLE 21. The Government of this Kingdom is that of a Constitutional Monarchy, under His Majesty Kamehameha V., His Heirs and Successors.” And from Queen Lili’uokalani, “Let it be repeated: the promulgation of a new constitution, adapted to the needs of the times and the demands of the people, has been an indisputable prerogative of the Hawaiian monarchy." (Both citations can be found in The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume II, 1854-1874, Twenty Critical Years by Ralph S. Kuykendall, 1953)
11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. 96 Occupation is essentially provisional. 97 Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State. 98 In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it. 99 Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.100 (LOWM, page 772).
Procedures illegally defines “Native Hawaiians,” in fact, every definition by Congress of “Native Hawaiians” violates the law and also fails to distinguish between Hawaiian as a race and Hawaiian as a nationality, omitting and ignoring naturalized Hawaiian subjects and their descendants. Hawaiians are not “indigenous,” we are “Aboriginal Hawaiian” or Kanaka Maoli, a race and a nationality. Naturalized subjects are Kanaka Hawai’i or “Native Hawaiian,” a nationality only. Article 3 of the Will of King Lunalilo, 1871, provides “for the use and accommodation of poor, destitute and infirm people of Hawaiian (aboriginal) blood or extraction, giving preference to old people.” And from the Compiled Laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom 1884, “§432. Every foreigner so naturalized, shall be deemed to all intents and purposes a native of the Hawaiian Islands.”
And Procedures violates the Constitution by exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority, because only you, Sir, the President, as Head of State, has sovereign power over foreign affairs and acquiring foreign land. Congress has authority only over domestic matters, not “government-to-government” relations. Under Procedures, Congress again illegally vests themselves with the power to acquire foreign land via autocratic sovereignty over the Hawaiian Kingdom, a Tyranny, over a so-called “Native Hawaiian Governing Entity.” Page 45, “§50.44 How will the formal government-to-government relationship between the United States Government and the Native Hawaiian Governing Entity be implemented? (b) The Native Hawaiian Governing Entity will be subject to the plenary authority of Congress.” From thelawdictionary.com, “What is PLENARY? Full; entire; complete; unabridged. What is TYRANNY? Arbitrary or despotic government; the severe and autocratic exercise of sovereign power, either vested constitutionally in one ruler, or usurped by him by breaking down the division and distribution of governmental powers.”
“I have no patience for injustice, no tolerance for government incompetence, no sympathy for leaders who fail their citizens,” President Trump, 2016 RNC.
"Can the plunder be snatched from the mighty, or the captives of a tyrant be delivered? Indeed, this is what the LORD says: "Even the captives of the mighty will be taken away, and the plunder of the tyrant will be retrieved; I will contend with those who contend with you, and I will save your children" (Isaiah 49:24).
Congress has been tyrannically violating jus cogens and the Rule of Law, exceeding its Constitutional authority, and abusing its power since the inception of this dispute, passing over 150 fraudulent acts, including annexation and statehood acts. The following is excerpted from Legal Issues Raised by Proposed Presidential Proclamation To Extend the Territorial Sea, Memorandum Opinion for the Legal Adviser, Department of State, October 4, 1988, by Douglas W. Kmiec, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, page 252.
The constitutionality of the annexation of Hawaii, by a simple legislative act, was strenuously contested at the time both in Congress and by the press. The right to annex by treaty was not denied, but it was denied that this might be done by a simple legislative act.... Only by means of treaties, it was asserted, can the relations between States be governed, for a legislative act is necessarily without extraterritorial force—confined in its operation to the territory of the State by whose legislature it is enacted. Westel Woodbury Willoughby, The Constitutional Law of the United States § 239, at 427 (2d ed. 1929).
It is therefore unclear which constitutional power Congress exercised when it acquired Hawaii by joint resolution. Accordingly, it is doubtful that the acquisition of Hawaii can serve as an appropriate precedent for a congressional assertion of sovereignty over an extended territorial sea.31
31 Cong. Rec 5975 (1898). He thus characterized the effort to annex Hawaii by joint resolution after the defeat of the treaty as “a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which cannot be lawfully done.”
There is a serious question whether Congress has the authority either to assert jurisdiction over an expanded territorial sea for purposes of international law or to assert the United States’s sovereignty over it.
We believe that the only clear congressional power to acquire territory derives from the constitutional power of Congress to admit new states into the union.
And from attorney Mr. Stephen Laudig in Notice for "War Crimes of Unlawful and Wanton Appropriation of Property" from Hawai’i County Council Member Ms. Jen Ruggles to President Trump:
Congressional legislation has no extraterritorial effect. See, The Apollon, 22 U.S. 362, 370 (1824) and United States v. Curtiss Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 318 (1936),” and “If it was “unclear which constitutional power Congress exercised when it acquired Hawaii by joint resolution” in 1898, it would be equally unclear as to how the Congress could enact a statute establishing the Territory of Hawai‘i in 1900 (31 Stat. 141), and the State of Hawai‘i in 1959 (73 Stat. 4) within the territory of a foreign State.
The law with regard to which branch of government recognizes foreign States or governments is clearly stated by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1897. The executive branch is the sole mouthpiece of the nation in communication with foreign sovereignties. Foreign nations communicate only through their respective executive departments. Resolutions of their legislative departments upon diplomatic matters have no status in international law. In the department of international law, therefore, properly speaking, a congressional recognition of belligerency or independence would be a nullity. See Sen. Doc. 56, 54th Cong. 2d Sess. (1897), p. 20-22.
And from attorney and member of the House of Representatives, Thomas H. Ball of Texas, to Congress on June 15, 1898, regarding the joint resolution annexing Hawai‘i:
The annexation of Hawai‘i by joint resolution is unconstitutional, unnecessary, and unwise. If the first proposition be true, sworn to support the Constitution, we should inquire no further. I challenge not the advocates of Hawaiian annexation, but those who advocate annexation in the form now presented, to show warrant or authority in our organic law for such acquisition of territory. To do so will be not only to subvert the supreme law of the land but to strike down every precedent in our history. …Why, sir, the very presence of this measure here is the result of a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be done lawfully.
For now, my last complaint about Congress’s war crimes is this example from the hypocritical war criminal, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mrs. Nancy Pelosi. Mrs. Pelosi has said, “Every aspect of our lives must be subjected to an inventory ... of how we are taking responsibility,” and it is time for her to take her share of responsibility for war crimes.
She was also quoted as saying, "No one is above the law" when trying to impeach you, Mr. President, while disingenuously violating the Constitution of the United States and International Law, including the GCIV on allegiance, “Art. 45. It is forbidden to compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to swear allegiance to the hostile Power.” And LOWM 11.4.2 again, “In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it.” These laws also prohibit implying a loss of sovereignty and nationality, and makes cultural misappropriation of Hawaiian culture a war crime.
During an interview on TODAY with Mrs. Savannah Guthrie, January 2019, Mrs. Pelosi talks about one of her many regular $10,000-a-night luxury resort vacations to the temporarily occupied Hawaiian Kingdom, like this one during the government shutdown, luxuriating at the 5-star Four Seasons Hualalai Resort and the Fairmont Orchid, and escorted by police with $34,000 of taxpayer’s money. “The President might not know this but, Hawai’i is part of the United States of America, maybe he doesn’t realize that” (0:41) and “I happily saw uh, ‘O Holy Night,’ ‘Silent Night,’ and the rest, sung in Hawaiian, and danced uh to Hawaiian movements, and the rest. It was a beautiful part of American culture" (1:22). Mrs. Pelosi’s criminal cultural misappropriation of “Hawaiian movements” as a part of her culture refers to our dance, Hula, which is a beautiful part of Hawaiian culture, not American culture. And she is violating International Law and the Constitution of the United States by saying that Hawai'i is part of the United States.
Unfortunately, my Letter to President Trump is too long to fit here. Please continue reading at my website: http://princesskuuleialoha.com/noticetrump
And please consider leaving a tip to support us, your aloha means more to us than we can express to you ❤Mahalo❤.
❤ Thank you so much ❤
Love, Princess Ku'uleialoha