Psyche logo

Split and D.I.D.(Dissociative Identity Disorder)

Detailed, yet plotted poorly.

By Moonlit Sky.Published 3 years ago 3 min read
One of my favourite scenes.

This movie, or rather M.Night Shyamalan, made one giant mistake in regards to using D.I.D. as a way for his character to have a "super power" and to be a complex villain.

The odd thing is, this movie does get a few things right. It does, bear with me.

First, it is accurate that D.I.D. is developed via experiencing severe, complex, often repeated trauma as a child any time from 0-8 years old.

For those who don't know. Basically, when a child (between these ages) is put through enough trauma (all types, too many to list), that is too much for them to handle and live every day life, as most of these children have to do. Their brain goes, "I am not going to survive this, if all the parts of me know it's happening". So, the child dissociates HEAVILY and the brain separates itself to save itself.

If you'd like to know more, please watch one of the MANY videos that are educational on what D.I.D. is. I would recommend Dissociadid as they are very educational and the system that hosts the channel deals with D.I.D. on a daily basis. Or Anthony Padilla's "Day with Multiple Personalities" video. Which isn't really titled correctly, but that's not important here.

Back to Split, the second bit that he got right, is that the alters can be as different as me to my neighbours, or you to your least favourite coworker for example. The alters aren't always totally different from one another, but in a lot of cases they are.

Third, I would give him credit for the character having a therapist, though she does go pretty heavy into the supernatural side of D.I.D., which there isn't necessarily unless you look at it that way. But he has one, and I will actually give him credit for the detail of the teenage girl prank that may have set the "dangerous alters" into motion. Which, I will get into in a moment.

Lastly, I will also give Shyamalan the credit of getting the first word of the Disorder right. Meaning, he does indeed show the Dissociation accurately. The alters do not know what's been going unless they are co-conscious, and he shows them fronting, clearly just waking up more or less.

Unfortunately, the entire plot of the movie was a bad idea. Because here's the TRUTH and if you don't find me credible enough which would be fair as I'm not a professional. Simply go watch a video by Dissociadid, or Multiplicity and Me, Pinada system. Please not Trisha Paytas, that's a whole thing on its own and she gives no accurate information on the topic so it would be a waste of your time if you want to learn about the disorder.

But, back to the point, the big mistake was using D.I.D. in this movie to begin with. BECAUSE BACK TO THE TRUTH, you would have a better chance of winning the lottery than finding a person with D.I.D. who has a dangerous alter. I honestly don't know if anyone out there right now, has D.I.D. and a dangerous alter.

There is no such thing as a "beast with abilities" in alters. Or maybe in their inner world they do, but not in the physical world we reside in. People with D.I.D. are not dangerous and are not monsters. They are human beings who have been through hell, and saved themselves because no one else would. THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO WERE TRAUMATIZED TO THE POINT OF POTENTIAL DEATH, likely by or through a primary caregiver, and no one was there for them. No one rescued them, no one did anything about it.

So they saved themselves, and their brains were broken into pieces as a result. They are scared people who just want to be believed and understood.

Part of that was anger toward recent YouTube events, not anyone reading this. Which, if you have, thank you so much!

So, Split, made one huge mistake. But, while it does not represent actual D.I.D., it does get details accurate and honestly it's worth a watch. I say this because James McAvoy does do one hell of a performance playing different characters/alters in this movie, and I think his acting should be respected. And the women who played their part, of course, he wasn't alone. Shout out to Anya Taylor-Joy. That character herself was actually quite accurate to someone who has been abused by a loved one.

In conclusion, thank you for reading, and take this post as you will, just had to get it out there. Though seriously give this movie a watch but remember it's not really D.I.D. in respect to those who actually have it and deal with on a daily basis, but it's good.


About the Creator

Moonlit Sky.

I'm a writer. Often with a dirty mind. I love animals, movies, TV shows and books.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights


There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2023 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.