Can we give up on bioethics?

Bioethics is a prerequisite for human existence, human civilization, human wisdom, and human social life. Can we give up the idea of life if it proves to be a false and logically faulty concept? Can we stop aiming at survival? As you can imagine, almost everyone's answer is no. Without the existence of the concept of life, human existence cannot proceed, human intelligence is mostly null and void, and social life cannot continue. Without the existence of life, how can the order of human behavior be established? Human existence loses its basis, and all existential activities lose their purpose and meaning. In what way does mankind exist if not as a living being? What is a man if not a living being?

Human beings have never appeared to abandon the concept of bioethics, not even the concept of life has been questioned, much less the logical model of competition for survival. We see life and its mode of existence as objective, or simply packaged and shoved into God as God's arrangement, but why would God make such an arrangement? Who knows? We have been running for thousands of years in this unworkable logic of life ethics, and our wisdom has been used to run this awkward logic of life ethics, and we have paid a heavy price for running this flawed model of life, and that price is the suffering of life.

We do not know that the concept of life is the root of all contradictions, that the life model is the root of all human ills. We do not know that the life pattern is the root of all human ills. We do not know that the source of the ills is not the life concept itself, and we do not solve the conflicts and problems by solving the life pattern itself, and we adopt containment and diversion to solve all the problems on earth, but the problems continue to occur, and we are at our wits' end. We could never have imagined that the spiritual concept of life would be the root of all disasters and the source of all evils. However, it is still a source of great confusion and bewilderment to present it in this way. We have not thought that the greatest problem on earth is the problem of life and death, the greatest conflict on earth is the competition for survival, and the most unanswerable thing on earth is the purpose and meaning of existence. What other issue on earth exceeds the importance of the ethics of life? What else on earth can be the premise of existence? Why does man not exist for life? So all the questions focus on the idea of life. Should the idea of life exist or not? We can no longer avoid it.

The question of whether the idea of life should exist or not is not whether a man should exist or not, but why man must exist based on the idea of life. Why must people exist in a lifestyle? Why must people establish their relationship with each other by the ethics of life? Why must people see the world from the standpoint of life? Since life is an artificial and subjective spiritual concept, why can it not be changed? Why is it not okay for a man to live in the form of a non-life concept? What does it mean to have a thought? Life is the difference between our human thoughts. This one thought alone determines the path of human beings to the south; this one thought alone determines the fate of human beings to a catastrophic and unrecoverable fate.

The existence of life is unsustainable, life is the transient existence of inevitable death, and this transient existence can not have meaning compared with the course of hundreds of millions of years of existence. Can it be rational for us to spend our lives suffering in this meaningless life? The solution to life is extremely simple, which is to give up the subjective idea of life and return to the original reason for existence. Not using the idea of life is not the same as not living. We live in other ideas, in the original reason of existence, why not? Without the concept of life, one does not take life and death, one perceives all existence equally, the world continues to exist as we humans do, and existence continues in our bodies and perceptions, why is this not possible?

Without life, all problems in the ethics of life immediately dissolve, and without the ethics of life, contradictions and problems lose their reason for existence. We exist in a new idea and a new paradigm that will have new ethics, a new logic, a new order, and present new forms. This is perfectly feasible in theory, just as it was feasible when we came ashore from the ocean to become terrestrial animals, without any doubt at all. What we doubt and worry about is: won't the new model have new problems? We must not use survival thinking and survival logic to imagine that we will surely ask such pseudo-questions as whether people will not die under the new model. The problem of the new paradigm is solved with the new idea. We must not be surprised if the new paradigm itself is the paradigm without any contradictory problems; the ethical logic that existed for hundreds of millions of years is the one without contradictory problems, otherwise, it would not have existed for hundreds of millions of years.

If the new idea is a rational or intelligent version of the original ethical logic, we should not be surprised, because this is the inevitability of existence. The end of the transient mode of life, the opening of the eternal mode of existence, and the beginning of our rational and civilized life of perception with the biological logic of existence would be the result of our decisive abandonment of the ethics of life, and thankfully: we are not far from this inevitable result.