West Coast Milblogger

Hello West Coast Milblogger fans. Taking next week off, so this is the last installment in this format. We’re going to make an overhaul in order to more effectively write a crypto blog using an AI vlog. A two-prong approach.

From A to Z strives to maintain a lead in technological adaptation with media applications even with past financial difficulties caused by overspending. What will the company think of next?

A feature length screenplay now in the works. This blog/vlog a bridge between the prequel known in lore throughout underground culture as “The Lords of Hemp” and the new screenplay taking shape titled “Z-Dead” with an outline for “Z-Dead+” already written.

So it’s true, while the West Coast Milblogger is geared toward the unpopular topic of war, it’s using this as a means for promotion of other commercial projects. It’s better understood as a testing ground without critics. So, when opportunity strikes, From A to Z is going to be prepared.

This might feel counterintuitive until you understand the selling out for commercial success could be linked with the change in perception needed for the money to flow into places we’ve made popular.

Now to the topic we remain in touch with on an international level. The conflicts around the world shaping our reality.

It feels like we’ve been on high alert all week waiting for Iran to attack Israel. However, as we’ve identified, Russia remains off balance with developments in the Middle East.

While international condemnation has forced Putin 2.0 to make friends with rogue states like North Korea and Iran the latter is proving to have forced this infidel into deciding who’s a friendlier nation, Israel or Iran.

Historically, Russia has a pretty good relationship with Israel. When the nation was formed after World War Two many Russian Jews moved inside the new borders, making the Russian language one of the most popular after Hebrew.

Of course, Russia had a war with Iran. There’s even the chance after Iran gets nuclear technology they could use it against Russia. The relationship based more on need than want.

So now, as Iran launches cruise missiles, drones, and ballistic missiles against Israel we continue to see the constraint placed upon them by Russia’s double dealing.

After all the rhetoric of Iran, only a nuclear explosion could equal the force of their words. Instead, we’re hearing 99-percent of all projectiles have been shot down. That’s incredible given the difficulty of destroying ballistic missiles as we’ve learned in Ukraine.

Is it propaganda? Or has the West once again underplayed their hand to create the perception of futility in these attacks. America has vowed not to go on the offense against Iran. You can almost feel how elated they are in this new conversation with “Satan.” Even as locals still chant “Death to America” in rural towns.

In this context, Iran’s much advertised attack on Israel has become a fireworks show. Another interpretation of the optics could be Fourth of July celebrations in Dearborn, Michigan.

Have we once again witnessed the value of a free open just society. Can it be a bi-polar world order cannot be created when one superpower is no longer a pole, but a fragmented ray of light inclusive of those who wish to destroy it. In such a place, “Death to America” can be put on the ballot where it can lose in a landslide.

As the war in Ukraine continues that seems to be what we’re living through. We’ve all felt the fear of nuclear war, yet threats subside as people continue about their lives doing simple things. Even Putin 2.0 sleeps sometimes.

Now, he must sleep knowing that intercontinental nuclear ballistic missiles can be shot down in the masses. That’s the final nail in the nuclear threat. The ability to destroy launched nuclear ballistic missiles without the need of retaliation should the nuclear wind turn toward the aggressor.

We can all sleep better once the only nuclear threat becomes a suicidal terrorist trying to sneak a nuclear bomb into a concert hall. Yet it is the citizens who suffer if they cannot trust security to protect them from threats in a political situation.